Ironman Coeur d’Alene

We were back at Coeur d’Alene, Idaho for another ironman. In 2006 we had ventured to this beautiful venue quite a bit under trained buoyed only by the fitness from Ironman New Zealand which had been changed to a half-distance duathlon due to weather conditions. This year we were more prepared under the guidance of our coach, the great Mark Allen, but this would be our first ironman race since starting with Mark’s plan which emphasized aerobic conditioning. Our primary concern leading up to this race was how cold the water would be race morning. When we arrived five days prior, the temp was only 54°F. It was so cold that Ironman North America made an exception to their rules by allowing booties. Mark had suggested that we don O’Neill neoprene thermal shirts in addition to our Blue Seventy booties and neoprene caps. The thermal shirts actually added to our buoyancy while the booties would help with the run into transition. On the other hand, the booties tended to fill with water - bad! So many decisions…but we stuck with our plan for better or for worse. On the bright side, the ambient temperatures and calm conditions were predicting a great day.

 

Here is Sherwick’s recap:

 

“By race morning the water temps had warmed up to 59°F and the swim was actually quite pleasant. It took about a mile to get out of traffic and gain control of my breathing and my swim was uncharacteristically slow which I could partially blame on the booties - note taken.

 

The bike started off very smooth except for one bump in the road at mile 9 – literally. While passing another athlete, I lost one of my bottles of Fluid Energizer holding 800 calories when I hit a seam in the road which launched my bottle. It wasn’t until mile 63 that I was able to get my second bottle of Fluid Energizer at special needs. I kept my heart rate in the mid-140s as prescribed and at times the ride even felt easy! On lap two, my heart rate was 5 beats lower although the effort was slightly higher. A strong headwind for the final 5 miles of each lap greeted me but my splits showed a relatively steady pace for the 112 miles:

BIKE SPLIT 1: 34 mi  (1:47:07), 19.04 mph

BIKE SPLIT 2: 90 mi (3:01:54), 18.47 mph

BIKE SPLIT 3: 112 mi (1:12:10), 18.29 mph

TOTAL BIKE: 112 mi (6:01:11), 18.61 mph

 

I felt the beginning twinges of cramping in the first mile of the run but by the time I turned around to head into town, I was running around 7:50s which I was able to maintain halfway into the first lap. My pace then slowed to 8:15s and 8:30s with mile 10 showing 9:00! I found that I had to really focus on my form to run 8:45s but my concentration would not get me through 13 more miles. I knew I had to try something else and decided to take in coke earlier than planned. 8:30s then came rather easily for lap two. With ten miles to go, I started my build and having a target also helped - my friend Dale Jackson had a 30 minute lead off the bike but now was within striking distance! When he saw me, he started running harder but I managed to catch him with 3 miles to go! My pace was in the low 8:00s but three age-group males passed me in the last mile. I really had nothing to offer them.”

 

Here is what Jami had to say about her race:

 

“My aim was to minimize the inevitable contact inherent to any mass swim start with over 4000 moving arms and legs. So I started the swim where the fewest swimmers were situated. Nevertheless one big foot found its way to my goggles immediately filling them with water! But the momentary blindness didn’t slow me down as much as the drag from my water-filled socks. I posted my slowest Ironman swim ever, but exited the water in anticipation for how the next 138.2 miles would turn out.

 

The course was hilly so I let my heart rate drift higher than my maximum aerobic rate of 147 bpm. Holding back while others passed me was mentally challenging, but I knew I’d reap the benefits on the second 56-mile loop. I was able to abide by my tactics throughout the race: using the downhill sections for free speed, braking deeper into and accelerating out of each turn, all the while maintaining my aero position for the majority of the ride. Consequently, I conserved energy and felt better than ever on the second loop when I was able to push harder while others were failing. I lost only a fraction of time (the speed difference between the two laps was less than 1 mph), but my overall bike time was almost one hour slower than my best. Perhaps I took it too easy.

 

I failed to meet my goals to PR on the swim and bike, but the run was still to come and I felt great! Aside from a slight stumble upon dismounting my bike, I got my "running legs" sooner than I ever have. I was holding back every step on the run, anxious to “let it rip”, which I was prepared to do with 10 miles to go. At mile 16, I released the pent up energy and upped my effort. My heart rate began to drop indicating I was low on calories so I opted for my denser Fluid Energizer over coke although the caffeine would’ve surely given me a boost. I actually felt like my feet could run faster than my body could keep pace until the last two miles which proved to be the most challenging. Every step took a lot of effort and my form was faltering. Mentally, I was suddenly weary and images of Chupps running next to me came to mind- an inspiration I often seek since he would keep running even when he was most tired! Heading down the final chute with the crowd roaring and cheering was for me the most exciting part of this race. In addition, I had my parents there on race day and was racing with my newly-wed husband and several long-time friends so I had the most enjoyable race ever!”

 

We wish to send David Ridder, our friend who couldn’t make the start due to his serious injury from Auburn’s World’s Toughest, a speedy recovery - we can’t wait to have you back out there with us! We’d also like to thank our parents, Marva and Al Andrews, for trekking 15 hours with their dogs to watch us race. We were most appreciative of their presence and the awesome handmade poster they made for us! We both had pleasurable races but our slowest Ironman times (unrelated to nutrition issues) and it was evident that our aerobic engines would take a little longer to fully develop. Our optimal performances from our newly-adopted low-heart-rate training will have to wait for Ironman Austria 2009!

 

2008_IM_CDA_Garmin_run_crop.jpg

Sherwick’s Garmin download from the marathon

Jami 12:23:49, 38th age-group, 129th female

Sherwick 11:02:46, 53rd age-group, 223rd male

 

Tri for Real

After the ironman, we needed a “transition” race for the second half of our season so we chose the Tri for Real olympic-distance triathlon. Although we weren’t 100% recovered from Coeur dA’lene, we both had “ok” races.

 

Sherwick’s swim was fairly competitive but the bike and run were off, placing him 6th among the 40-44 men and 18th overall. Jami had a great start to her race clocking one of her best 1.5K swims. She passed several other athletes as she redlined her effort all the way to through the run finishing in 3rd for her age group and 5th overall.

 

Once again, Jami’s parents came out for the race and we’d like to thank them for their continued support!

 

Jami 2:26:56, 3rd age-group, 5th female

Sherwick 2:17:10, 6th age-group, 18th male

 

Vineman Aquabike

The Vineman Aquabike was next on our list and we had originally thought that skipping the hardest part of an ironman would make the race easier. Well it didn’t. In fact, both of us had forgettable races including dreadful bike rides. Sherwick cramped severely at mile 85 with the second 56-mile loop almost 2 mph slower! Although Jami put out her second fastest ironman swim, she too cramped on the bike (for the first time ever) and was uncomfortable during the entire bike ride. A professional bike fit was in order so we went to Front of the Pack in Palo Alto. Darrell Eng had a different approach to bike fitting emphasizing comfort over pure aerodynamics or power. The logic was that if we weren’t comfortable on our bicycles, everything else goes out the window. So we made some rather subtle changes which actually resulted in a dramatic difference to our comfort level while in the aerodynamic position - but as any triathlete will tell you, comfort is a relative term!  We are looking forward to our latter races in the season!

 

\

Jami 7:57:39, 3rd age-group, 9th female

Sherwick 7:00:17, 8th age-group, 23rd male

 

Enjoy the ride!

--Team JaS

 

JaS_HMB_2008_Jun_07.JPG

 

Special thanks to our sponsors:

Fiber Wise Pasta

Panolin America Lubricants

Vortex Racing Components

Sock Guy Socks

TCX Boots

Rudy Project Sunglasses

Drive Systems USA / AFAM Parts

Suomy Helmets

Motowheels Performance Parts

Monster Energy Drink